![]() ![]() The assessment of gait speed has been shown to be a reliable marker, both for assessing survival and for predicting adverse events in the elderly (falls, hospitalization, need for caregivers, etc.). Īmong the depletions associated with aging and frailty is a decrease in the speed of walking. Early detection of the particular situations that lead to the dependence of elderly people will enable the establishment of corrective measures to prolong an individual’s autonomy. Ĭurrently, the early identification of frailty is centred on the loss of functional capacities, comorbidities, the appearance of disability and dependencies, etc. These studies have allowed us to explain the frailty phenotype in a more adequate and empirical way, as a situation of biological instability related to the aging of human beings. In the last two decades, the concept of frailty has undergone a considerable change, associated with the development of epidemiological studies on population aging. The frailty associated with aging has been studied for decades. The world’s population is experiencing a gradual and incessant increase in the number of elderly people. The reliability of the Extended TUG test progressively decreases with increasing age, being excellent for the younger age groups and good for the oldest age group. Intergroup reliability, compared with intragroup reliability, was slightly lower, ranging between 0.779 for G3 and 0.972 for G1 (G2 = 0.853). Specifically, intragroup reliability ranged from 0.784 for G3 to 0.977 for G1 (G2 = 0.858). The reliability of the Extended TUG test is excellent for the first and second decades but drops down to good for the third decade. Both the intragroup and intergroup reliability of the measurements in the Extended TUG were analysed. Each participant performed the Extended TUG three consecutive times, with a rest break between tests of 120 s. MethodsĪn analytical cross-sectional study of 114 recruited participants (63 women) of average age 70.17 (± 7.3) years was undertaken. CDC govt.To analyse the reliability, variance and execution time of the Extended Timed Up and Go (Extended TUG) test in three age groups of elderly participants (G1: 55–64 years G2: 65–74 years G3: 75–85 years).Predicting the Probability for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Using the Timed Up & Go Test.Physical Therapy, Volume 80, Issue 9, 1 September 2000, Pages 896-903 The timed up & go: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. de Vries NM, Staal JB, van Ravensberg CD, Hobbelen JSM, Olde Rikkert MGM, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG.Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale. Rolfson DB, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, Tahir A, Rockwood K.EFS total score from 0 to 3 points indicates no frailty 4 or 5 points indicate prefrailty 6 to 8 points indicates frailty and 9 to 17 points indicates severe frailty.the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) define a cut off score of > = 12 seconds to predict risk of falling in an elderly person (4).Shumway-Cook et al in a later study defined a cut off score of > 14 seconds to predict the risk of falling (83% probability of being a faller).a cut off score of >=20 seconds was shown to predict falls in community-dwelling frail elderly people.Podsiadlo and Richardson in their original description of this test defined (3).consists of a measurement of the time in seconds for a person to rise from sitting from a standard arm chair, walk 3 m, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down.TUG tests the basic mobility skills of frail elderly persons.domains include cognitive impairment, autoevaluation of general health status, functional dependency, presence of social support, drug treatments and adherence, nutrition and mood, presence of incontinence, and the 'timed up and go (TUG)' test.consists of nine domains and eleven items, each scoring 0 points (frailty absent or normal health), 1 point (minor errors or mild/moderate impairment), or 2 points (important errors or severely impaired).frailty status can be assessed using the Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) (1,2).Respiratory and chest medicine chevron_right.Diabetes and endocrinology chevron_right. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |